| The term multi-stakeholder processes (MSPs)
describes processes which aim to bring together all major stakeholders
in a new form of communication, decision-finding (and possibly
decision-making) on a particular issue. They are also based
on recognition of the importance of achieving equity and accountability
in communication between stakeholders, involving equitable representation
of three or more stakeholder groups and their views. They are
based on democratic principles of transparency and participation,
and aim to develop partnerships and strengthened networks between
stakeholders. MSPs cover a wide spectrum of structures and levels
of engagement. They can comprise dialogues on policy or grow
into consensus-building, decision-making and implementation
of practical solutions. The exact nature of any such process
will depend on the issues, its objectives, participants, scope,
time lines, etc.
Hence, MSPs come in many shapes. Each situation, issue or problem
prompts the need for participants to design a process specifically
suited to their abilities, circumstances, and needs. However,
there are a number of common aspects – values and ideologies
underlying the concept of MSPs, questions and issues which need
to be addressed when designing an MSP, and stages of such a
process. Our suggestions form a common yet flexible framework,
which we offer for consideration to those who design, monitor
and evaluate MSPs.
MSPs are not a universal tool, not a panacea for all kinds
of issues, problems and situations. MSPs are akin to a new species
in the eco-system of decision-finding and governance structures
and processes. They are suitable for those situations where
dialogue is possible, where listening, reconciling interests,
and integrating views into joint solution strategies seems appropriate
and within reach.
MSPs have emerged because there is a perceived need for a more
inclusive, effective manner for addressing the urgent sustainability
issues of our time. A lack of inclusiveness has resulted in
many good decisions for which there is no broad constituency,
thus making implementation difficult. Because MSPs are new,
they are still evolving. Because they are people-centred, people
need to take ownership and responsibility for them, using and
refining them to serve their own purposes and the larger purposes
of the global community of which they are part. |